Independent recruiters and specialist agencies often know their professionals well. They know who is reliable under pressure, who prefers short projects and who will not travel more than an hour. The difficulty is rarely a lack of knowledge. It is that the knowledge is scattered.
Profiles live in a database, often incomplete or out of date. Assignments arrive by email, through portals or in a phone call, each described differently. Updates on availability come through messages that never make it into the system. When a new assignment appears, finding the right people depends on what the recruiter happens to remember, and a relevant opportunity can be missed simply because the information was not in one place.
More than keywords
Keyword search is the usual first answer, but it captures only part of what makes a match useful. A suitable professional for an interim, project or staff-augmentation role also needs to be available at the right time and for the right duration. The relevant experience has to be recent enough and in a comparable context. Preferences matter: remote or on site, sector, type of organisation, the kind of team. So do location, travel time and rate expectations, and the specifics of the assignment itself, such as the stakeholder environment or the stage of the project.
Two similar profiles
An illustrative assignment makes the point: a six-month interim role as a data migration lead for a financial services organisation, mostly on site, starting in three weeks. Two profiles look almost identical on paper. Both list data migration, both have worked in financial services, both mention the same tools.
A closer look tells a different story. The first professional finishes a current assignment in two months and has said she prefers hybrid roles. The second is available immediately but has spent the past three years in advisory work rather than hands-on delivery, and has a rate expectation above the assignment’s budget. Neither is necessarily wrong for the role, but neither is the straightforward match a keyword search suggests. The useful information lies precisely in the differences.
A more structured workflow
Recognising those differences consistently requires a more structured way of working. The proposed workflow has five parts:
What a useful suggestion shows
A suggestion is only helpful if the recruiter can judge it quickly. It should show the supporting information, such as the relevant experience and the overlap in skills and sector. It should flag missing facts, for instance that availability was last confirmed four months ago. It should make uncertainties visible, such as a rate expectation that may not fit the budget. And ideally it points to the next question to ask: “Is she open to three days on site?”
Human review does not remove the need to evaluate the suggestions themselves. If suggestions are often irrelevant, poorly explained or based on stale data, recruiters will stop trusting them, and rightly so. The quality of suggestions has to be assessed explicitly, not assumed because a person checks the result.
Where SkillsMatch fits
SkillsMatch, a venture in development and validation at Xablu Venture Studio, is working on this recruiter-led approach: structured professional and assignment information, explained match suggestions and follow-up after placement. The recruiter remains responsible for the relationship with professionals and clients, for the qualitative assessment, for introductions and for decisions about which information is shared with whom. Which parts of the workflow add most value, and for which kinds of agency, is what the current validation is meant to establish. View SkillsMatch
No matching approach is free of bias by design. Structured information and explained suggestions can make assumptions easier to see and question, but they do not remove the need for careful, fair professional judgement.
Would you like to test this approach in practice? Choose one bounded talent pool and a set of current assignments, and agree in advance how you will judge whether a shortlist is useful. We can help you set up that test.
Explore a talent pool →