Experienced people are often asked for their view on new businesses. Usually the request is broad: take a look and tell us what you think. The answer tends to be polite and rarely decisive, because general feedback on a pitch seldom changes what a team does next.
At Xablu Venture Studio, the Venture Partner role starts from the other direction. The studio organises and builds each venture, and involves partners where their practical experience can help answer a specific question about a market, a buying process, a product choice or a commercial route. The value lies less in a partner’s seniority than in the fit between their experience and the question at hand.
Three illustrative moments show how that works. They are hypothetical and do not describe specific Xablu Venture Studio ventures or partners.
Moment one: challenging assumptions about the buyer
A venture team has spoken to a dozen potential users and believes it has found a clear buyer: the operations manager who experiences the problem every day. Before investing further, the studio prepares a short brief for a partner with many years in the sector, covering the problem as currently understood, who the team has spoken to, what it heard and which assumptions it is least sure of.
The partner reads the brief and raises something the team had not considered: in most organisations in this sector, purchases of this kind go through central procurement, and the operations manager influences the decision without signing it. The team uses that input to reshape its next round of conversations, adding budget holders and procurement, and to test whether the buying process is as long as the partner expects. The partner does not decide what is true; the evidence does. But the right challenge at the right time sends the team looking for the right evidence.
Moment two: assessing a product or commercial choice
Later, the venture faces a choice. Pilot users want two features, and the team can build only one well in the time available. One supports daily use; buyers mention the other when discussing price. The studio sets out the options, the evidence behind each and the cost of getting the choice wrong.
An experienced operator who has taken comparable products to market reviews the choice with the team. Drawing on what drove adoption and renewal in their own work, they identify which risks are recoverable and which are not, and suggest a way to test the pricing question before building the feature. The venture team makes the decision and remains accountable for it. The partner’s contribution is a sharper view of the trade-off, not a verdict.
Moment three: a relevant introduction
As the venture prepares for pilots, it needs conversations with organisations it cannot easily reach, and a partner knows people at one or two of them. Introductions are never a condition of the role. They happen only where the partner judges them useful and both sides agree.
When an introduction makes sense, the studio prepares what the other party needs: a clear description of the problem, what the venture is testing and what is being asked of them. The partner makes the connection; the venture team is responsible for the conversation and the follow-up. That protects the partner’s relationships and keeps the request proportionate.
What the role asks for
Across these moments, the expectations are consistent: relevant practical experience in a market, discipline or type of customer; a willingness to understand the specific question before answering it; constructive, critical judgement, including when it is uncomfortable; and a contribution focused on where that experience makes a difference.
The role does not involve a fixed number of hours, mandatory introductions or involvement in every venture. A partner may contribute intensively to one venture for a period and not at all to another. Because the studio prepares the questions and follows up on the input, a partner’s time goes to judgement rather than administration.
What partners gain
The value runs in both directions. Partners work on emerging businesses at a formative stage, when their experience can still shape what is built. They apply expertise developed over a career to new problems, and work alongside people in product, technology and commercial roles who see the same venture from different angles. For many, that exchange is the main reason to take part.
Clear boundaries
Focused input is different from a specialist assignment. If a venture needs substantial work from a partner, such as leading a commercial process or a defined piece of specialist analysis, that work is scoped separately. Any larger role, fee or commercial terms are agreed separately and in advance.
Partners may also choose to invest, in the Xablu Venture Evergreen Fund or in an individual venture, under separate arrangements with their own terms. That is voluntary. The partner role itself does not confer authority over funding decisions or a board position. The Venture Partner role does not automatically confer an equity interest in a venture. Any allocation is documented separately. Funding decisions remain with the fund’s Investment Committee, based on the evidence the studio prepares.
Do you have practical experience in a market, discipline or type of customer, and an interest in applying it to new ventures? Tell us about your experience and the questions you could help address.
Share your experience →